Posted by docgarg | Filed under Uncategorized
Intensive Revision course
12 Wednesday May 2021
12 Wednesday May 2021
11 Tuesday May 2021
Posted in Uncategorized
Thank you for participating in the session today.
In Rapid Random Review we discussed:
Dr D, Dr P and Dr K completed the task well.
Clinical station was: 6 year old boy who has come for routine FU. Examine his eyes.Dr D conducted the examination and covered all. He has a very real looking prosthetic eye.
Learning points:
Add your comments or anything I may have missed.
Anil Garg
07 Friday May 2021
Posted in Uncategorized
Thank you for participating in the session.
In RRR we discussed:
The above scenarios can present in various guises hence read and be prepared to consider more than ‘face value’ information.
Video scenario was of a young person – 14 years presenting with ‘seizure’ like activity.
Learning points:
Visit www.mrcpchonline.org to add your comments or points I may ahve missed.
Anil Garg
04 Tuesday May 2021
Posted in Uncategorized
Dear all
Thank you for participating in the session today.
Random Rapid Review:
Video scenario was of a 6- year old with evidence of generalised rash, involvement of mucosa and progressing to flaccid bullous eruption. Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis – a rare condition but can be fatal hence should know about it.
Have your DD: TENS / SJS / SSS.
Learning points:
Visit www.mrcpchonline.org to add your comments or any points I may have missed.
Anil Garg
30 Friday Apr 2021
Posted in Uncategorized
I found the sessions useful as it makes one think in a broader way which is required in the exam.
Most of the time we get a clue from universal cues but still thinking of 2/3 differentials open in mind is important which I learnt. I was looking forward for some short clinical stations.
Dr P. UK. 30 April 2021
29 Thursday Apr 2021
Posted in Uncategorized
Thank you for participating in the session today. We started on the video station.
After the RRR we had a video scenario.
Dr A & Dr S attempted the rapid reviews.
Random Rapid Review:
Video scenario was of a 2-old old newborn baby who was fitting. The differential diagnosis could be birth asphyxia, metabolic- hypoglycaemia and sepsis. Dr S & Dr V were in the hot seat. It was a interesting station.
Learning points:
Please visit www.mrcpchonline.org to add your comments or anything I may have missed.
Anil Garg
27 Tuesday Apr 2021
Posted in Uncategorized
Thank you for participating in the session today. We started on the video station.
After the RRR there was a brief presentation on the video station what is expected and how to attempt it and then we had a video scenario.
Dr C & Dr P attempted the rapid reviews.
Random Rapid Review:
Video scenario was of a 24-hour old newborn baby who was noted to be jittery irritable. The differential diagnosis could be drug withdrawal, birth asphyxia, metabolic- hypoglycaemia and sepsis. Dr P was in the hot seat with Dr Ji and Dr S being the examiners. It was a interesting station in that the most likely diagnosis is not very common in Asian countries
Learning points:
Add your comments or anything I may have missed.
Anil Garg
22 Thursday Apr 2021
Posted in Uncategorized
Thank you for participating in the session today and making it so interesting.
The rapid random review RRR were:
Dr C, Dr A, Dr P, Dr V & Dr S tackled the subjects with questions from colleagues. All were very well attempted.
Clinical station was with queues of a six month old increasing in weight from 58 to 91st centile and having symptoms off throwing out his arms with some head movement. DD was Over feeding with GOR and Infantile spams. Dr A took the hotseat. Dr A & Dr V kept their cool but got fixated on only one diagnosis – which most often can lead to problems.
Learning points:
Add your comments or any points I may have missed.
Anil Garg
20 Tuesday Apr 2021
Posted in Uncategorized
Thank you for participating in the session today.
In the Random Rapid Review: Dr C, Dr S, Dr M & Dr H took the hotseat and covered most of the points. Dr Akruti looked at the literature and provided brief summary with relevant investigations.
Extended clinical station. Universal queues were bilateral papilloedema and a CT scan showing deleted ridiculous system and identified lesion on one side. The lesion was more likely to be incidental due to its side and the dilated ventricles suggesting hydrocarbons which were more likely to be due to I said he better tumour. Dr J |& Dr A took the hot seat and did justice to the history taking but clinical examination overran the time.
Learning points:
Visit www.mrcpchonline.org to add your comments or anything I may have missed.
Anil Garg
15 Thursday Apr 2021
Posted in Uncategorized
Thank you for participating in the session today.
We discussed Extended Clinical Station examination and what to expect and how to proceed with time line. It is important to practice and have a structured approach to the examination as without that life can be very difficult.
Rapid Random Review:
Dr C, Dr S & DR A Dr V discussed Non Accidental Injury, Renal failure and ITP with good clarity. Be very careful of words you speak – need to be very specific. Describing common conditions is difficult and hence it is worth practising them.
Clinical scenario was of a 5.5 year old. IUGR, neonatal and stress related hypoglycaemia, growing along 2nd centile, biggish head, clinodactyly 5th finger. Silver Russel syndrome. Dr K made a good effort at History and examination – all can do with more practice to feel and have ‘fluid’ technique
Learning points:
Add your comments or points I may have missed.
Anil Garg